Summer of SCOTUS: Taxes - a podcast by Nia Rodgers and Dr. John Aughenbaugh

Aughie and Nia discuss the SCOTUS rulings concerning access to President Donald Trump's tax records, and whether U.S. Presidents can claim absolute immunity from the state criminal process. In the instance of Vance, the SCOTUS ruled that the President does not have immunity from a state criminal subpoena. In the instance of Mazars, the SCOTUS ruled that the Congress must present a compelling case to a judge (and outlined questions that should be asked) to justify their subpoenas.

Further episodes of Civil Discourse

Further podcasts by Nia Rodgers and Dr. John Aughenbaugh

Website of Nia Rodgers and Dr. John Aughenbaugh