35: A manifesto for reproducible science - a podcast by Dan Quintana

Dan and James discuss a new paper in the inaugural issue of Nature Human Behaviour, "A manifesto for reproducible science".
Some of the topics covered:What's a manfesto for reproducibility doing in a Nature group journal?
Registered reportsThe importance of incentives to actually make change happen
What people should report vs. what they actually reportA common pitfall of published meta-analyses
The reliance of metrics in hiring decisions and the impact of open science practicesTone police
How do we transition to open science practices?SSRN preprints being bought by Elsevier
Authors getting gouged by copyediting costs (and solutions)Does being 'double-blind' extend to doing your analysis blind
Trial monitoring is expensiveLinks
The paperhttp://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-016-0021
Our paper on reporting standards in heart rate variabilityhttp://www.nature.com/tp/journal/v6/n5/full/tp201673a.html
Equator guidelineshttp://www.equator-network.org
Facebook pagehttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/
Twitter accounthttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast

Further episodes of Everything Hertz

Further podcasts by Dan Quintana

Website of Dan Quintana