50: Special 50th episode (LIVE) - a podcast by Dan Quintana

Dan and James celebrate their 50th episode with a live recording! They cover a blog post that argues grad students shouldn’t be publishing, what’s expected of today’s postdocs, and the ‘tone’ debate in psychology.
BONUS: You can also watch the video of this episode on the Everything Hertz podcast channel (link below)Other stuff they cover:
James offends a sociologist, as is his wontThe argument for why grad students shouldn’t publish
Gatekeepers controlling what’s being publishedEditors that Google authors before sending papers out for review
Judging researchers on their institution’s locationJames on networking
How do you challenge reviewers when they say you are "too junior"The standards of Frontiers papers
Writing review papers for the wrong reasonsWhy are there so many meta-analyses?
Pre-registering your meta-analysisRegistered reports vs. pre-registration
What’s expected of today’s postdocsHow many papers should you peer review?
How James tried to ward off review requestsThings that millennials are ruining
The role of humour in the tone debateLinks
Episode video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pj3WsTiUuLo&t=3s
The “should grad students publish" article: https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2017/08/23/renewed-debate-over-whether-graduate-students-should-publish#.WaGAeN_v8jI.linkProspero meta-analysis registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/
Eiko Fried’s tweet on postdoc expectations: https://twitter.com/eikofried/status/902470702892290048James’ publons profile: https://publons.com/author/1171358/james-aj-heathers#profile
JANE: http://jane.biosemantics.orgAnonymous PubPeer comments: https://pubpeer.com/publications/0E0DAEBEC6183646F18F4FAED03B1A#7

Further episodes of Everything Hertz

Further podcasts by Dan Quintana

Website of Dan Quintana