ACMG Opposition to HR 3235—and the Backlash - a podcast by Grey Genetics
from 2020-01-20T18:28:13
On January 9, the American College of Medical Genetics sent a letter to members of the House of Representatives, voicing their opposition to HR 3235, a bill that would allow genetic counselors to be reimbursed by CMS for providing genetic counseling. The ACMG recommended additional language related to the scope of practice of genetic counselors, most notably opposing the ordering of genetic tests by genetic counselors.Ellen Matloff, a certified genetic counselor and the founder and CEO of My Gene Counsel, discusses the historical and social context for this opposition and explains why she sees this as part of a broader #MeToo moment in genetic counseling.
Related Links and Resources
Grey Genetics blog post article on Medicare and HR 3235: “Does Medicare Cover Genetic Counseling?”
H.R.3235 - Access to Genetic Counselor Services Act of 2019
Erica Ramos’ (Past NSGC President) twitter thread on GCs and test ordering
Stoll, Katie. “Is There A Doctor in the House? Physician-Mediated DTC Genetic Testing.” The DNA Exchange. January 6, 2020.
Adverse Events in Genetics Testing: A Case Series
- Adverse Events in Cancer Genetic Testing: the third case series
- Adverse Events in Genetic Testing: The Fourth Case Series
NSGC Resources to Advocate for H.R.3235
Are you looking for genetic counseling?
Grey Genetics is an independent telehealth genetic counseling and consulting company. Book an appointment with a genetic counselor specialized in your area of concern. All genetic counseling appointments take place over secure, HIPAA-compliant video-conferencing or by phone.
Grey Genetics on Twitter: @GreyGenetics
Grey Genetics on Instagram: @greygenetics
Further episodes of Genotypecast with Grey Genetics
Further podcasts by Grey Genetics
Website of Grey Genetics