MPEP Q&A 165: When Patent Owner Fails to File Timely Response to Any Office Action Prior to an Action Closing Prosecution (ACP) - a podcast by Lisa Parmley, USPTO Patent Practitioner #51006
from 2019-02-05T15:02:57
Question: List one consequence for when the patent owner fails to file a timely response to any Office action prior to an Action Closing Prosecution (ACP). Answer: If the patent owner fails to file a timely response to any Office action prior to an Action Closing Prosecution (ACP), it will result in the following consequences: Where there were no claims found patentable in the Office action, the examiner will issue a Notice of Intent to Issue Inter Partes Reexamination Certificate (NIRC) terminating prosecution and indicating the status of the claims as canceled. Where at least one claim is found patentable,…
The post MPEP Q & A 165: When Patent Owner Fails to File Timely Response to Any Office Action Prior to an Action Closing Prosecution (ACP) appeared first on Patent Education Series.
Further episodes of Patent Bar MPEP Q
Further podcasts by Lisa Parmley, USPTO Patent Practitioner #51006