MPEP Q&A 166: Further Written Opinion Established by the International Preliminary Examining Authority - a podcast by Lisa Parmley, USPTO Patent Practitioner #51006

from 2019-02-19T15:02:11

:: ::

Question: Name one item any further written opinion established by the International Preliminary Examining Authority should set forth. Answer: Any further written opinion established by the International Preliminary Examining Authority should set forth, as applicable: (A) Any defects in the international application concerning subject matter which is not required to be examined or which is unclear or inadequately supported; (B) Any negative findings with respect to any of the claims because of a lack of novelty, inventive step (non-obviousness) or industrial applicability; (C) Any defects in the form or contents of the international application; (D) Any finding by the examiner…


The post MPEP Q & A 166: Further Written Opinion Established by the International Preliminary Examining Authority appeared first on Patent Education Series.

Further episodes of Patent Bar MPEP Q

Further podcasts by Lisa Parmley, USPTO Patent Practitioner #51006

Website of Lisa Parmley, USPTO Patent Practitioner #51006