MPEP Q&A 31: Applicant Action After Invention is Found Obvious - a podcast by Lisa Parmley, USPTO Patent Practitioner #51006
from 2016-09-02T15:20:04
Question: Once Office personnel have established the Graham factual findings and concluded that the claimed invention would have been obvious, what must the applicant do? Answer: Once Office personnel have established the Graham factual findings and concluded that the claimed invention would have been obvious, the burden then shifts to the applicant to: show that the Office erred in these findings or provide other evidence to show that the claimed subject matter would have been nonobvious. Chapter Details: The answer to this question can be found in chapter 2100 of the MPEP. This chapter covers Patentability. The answer is from…
The post MPEP Q & A 31: Applicant Action After Invention is Found Obvious appeared first on Patent Education Series.
Further episodes of Patent Bar MPEP Q
Further podcasts by Lisa Parmley, USPTO Patent Practitioner #51006