MPEP Q&A 87: Reasons Practitioner Should Act as an Advocate Before a Tribunal - a podcast by Lisa Parmley, USPTO Patent Practitioner #51006
from 2017-04-25T14:04:35
Question: List one reason a practitioner should act as an advocate at a proceeding before a tribunal in which the practitioner is likely to be a necessary witness. Answer: A practitioner shall not act as advocate at a proceeding before a tribunal in which the practitioner is likely to be a necessary witness unless: The testimony relates to an uncontested issue; The testimony relates to the nature and value of legal services rendered in the case; or Disqualification of the practitioner would work substantial hardship on the client. Chapter Details: The answer to this question can be found in the…
The post MPEP Q & A 87: Reasons Practitioner Should Act as an Advocate Before a Tribunal appeared first on Patent Education Series.
Further episodes of Patent Bar MPEP Q
Further podcasts by Lisa Parmley, USPTO Patent Practitioner #51006